Reclaiming a Gentle Jesus? (Matthew 11:20-30)

There seems to have been a bit of a trend in Christian circles over recent years. It’s an odd trend if I’m being honest, one that I can understand the roots of but which still seems a bit… I dunno, extreme? Wish fulfilment?

The trend is that of the badass Jesus.

See, there are those, mainly manly men, who are reacting against the stereotype of ‘Gentle Jesus, meek and mild’. Jesus wasn’t like that, they say; he threw money lenders out of the Temple with a whip, he went toe-to-toe with authorities, he terrified the forces of evil. And yet here we are, living in a culture where you can buy pictures of Jesus looking like shiny blond hippy in a bedsheet.

This has therefore been replaced with another Jesus, a more masculine figure, one who looks like an outdoorsy carpenter. Someone you could imagine following to the Cross. Problem is, this can go too far and you end up with another straw man, this time Jesus as Chuck Norris, ready to roundhouse kick sinners in the face. Also, it seems to involve holding swords and quoting Braveheart a lot.

So which one is the true Jesus?

Well, look at Matthew 11:20-30. It starts off with the badass version – Jesus proclaiming woes and destruction on cities that had seen miracles but still rejected him. That’s the sort of Jesus some people like – you step out of line, you suffer the consequences. You’re saved only because of the Cross, and don’t you forget it.

But then it goes straight into “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

This is the gentle Jesus, the one who’ll help you and listen to you and share your burdens – a friend as opposed to a commanding officer.

Those verses pretty much sit next to each other in the Bible. Hmm.

Part of it is a wider crisis of masculinity within the church, I think – some of the words used, like ‘cissy’ point to something more than simply wanting to claim the tougher parts of Jesus’s ministry. After all, has anyone really seen Jesus as being weak? The guy walked a path that inevitably led to crucifixion, that’s not weakness by any stretch of the imagination. And gentleness and toughness aren’t mutually exclusive.

But here’s the thing – too often we try to put Jesus into a box. “He’s badass!” “No he’s not, he’s nice!” We want him to fit our preconceptions – if we want to wave swords around then we like a jesus who kicks butt; if we’re uncomfortable with that, we might prefer the Jesus who’d make a great babysitter. Neither of these are the whole story, of course, but they serve to make Jesus a comfortable figure.

And that’s the problem. These sort of things deny Jesus the complexity of even the average human being, let alone the one person who was both human and divine. I’m willing to bet even cage fighting champions smile at giggling babies, so why do we deny Jesus that complexity?

So yeah, Jesus was strong and tough. He got into (verbal) fights; he endured torture and nails through his hands.

And Jesus was gentle. He welcomed children, he cried publically when his friend died, he spoke kindly to outsiders.

He could hang out with former terrorists like Simon the Zealot; he also made his first resurrection appearance to a woman who was unlikely to have been believed when she ran home brimming over with the news.

And when talking about strength, Jesus wasn’t always big on the world’s strength – power is found in weakness, kingship in servanthood, an upside down kingdom of heaven. Who knows what badassery looks like in that sort of world?

When it comes down to it, Jesus is complicated. That’s my only real problem with the WWJD? trend from a few years back – What Would Jesus Do? Often it was the unexpected, because he doesn’t fit our stereotypes and preconceptions and agendas. When people asked him if he paid the Temple tax, he pulled the money out of a fish. I bet no-one saw that coming.

Jesus is tough. Jesus is gentle. Jesus is God, and Man, and, far from being a caricature, Jesus is complicated. To treat him as any less attempts to diminsh someone who is far too big to ever, ever hide in a box.



5 thoughts on “Reclaiming a Gentle Jesus? (Matthew 11:20-30)

  1. I immediately thought of John Eldredge when I started reading this post. And then when you mentioned “Braveheart,” I thought you must’ve been thinking him, too! “Wild at Heart” really focused on the idea that a Christian man was, well, manly, but it quoted “Braveheart” and “Gladiator” more than the Bible, which should tell us something.

    I look back at the fruits of the Spirit and see characteristics that aren’t associated with being manly – self-control, patience, love, GENTLENESS, etc. Anyone trying to paint a picture of a Jesus without these fruits is missing who He is.

    Not to deny your final conclusion about Jesus’ complexity. Thanks for emphasizing that, as I think a lot of us (at least I do) place Jesus in a box, even if we don’t mean to.

    • Well, I was partly thinking of Wild at Heart (which I found interesting, not always for theological reasons, but a bit alienating because I’m not an outdoorsy, sporty person), but also of some books subsequently influenced by Eldredge – I remember one where there were pages describing guys at a Christian conference going gaga over a replica sword from Braveheart. Now, I’m a big nerd and I’d love to be able to wave a sword around, but it seemed in distinct contrast to the Jesus who told Peter to, well… Throw down his sword!

      • Eldredge is interesting…I really, really enjoy his writing. I also feel a connection (maybe more than you) to his thoughts. But yeah…there does seems to often be this dichotomy.

  2. you really blow my mind, your thought provoke my thinking to exercise caution on this subject viz my new book on Godly character of meekness. Hence, i feel that jesus meekness or gentleness is not in isolation, it was unvarying with other virtues of righteousness. Jesus responded to life issues as the spirit offer him insights, his gentleness was the expression of the wisdom of God in him. Jesus’ gentleness did not condone evil, he came to tranform the system, he did it with a sense of dignity and where he appeared offensive, it was based on a righteous zeal for God; before Jesus came many O/T saints corrected evil in an offensive manner and thier intentions were commended by God. A gentle man in the context of Biblical dais, respect the dinity of humanhood in consonant to the ordenances of God, he never stops emphasizing God’s standard in love. please i expect your reply on my veiw send to my mail.

  3. Catholics changed everything about the Messiah! First of all, His name was never “Jesus” but Yahushua which has the meaning of salvation in Hebrew – Yahuweh saves.
    Secon, they framed the Messiah Yahushua in religious idol and tradition which the Messiah Yahushua was AGAINST!
    Third, they changed the teachings and say it’s okay to sin as long as you come to the priest into 2×2 room , confess your sins and be forgiven.
    Only one Elohim , the Creator can forgive sins. We don’t need to ask the priest. Our high priest is Yahushua the Messiah! No one else can substitute Him in His teachings and truth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s